I was going to take Rossi's suggestion and write about the current changes taking place for next years NCAA Tournament, Mark Cuban's apparent initiative towards making David Stern actually do his job by investigating the Heat for Tampering, and the Feds Investigating Fraud and Doping charges against (F*ck) Lance Armstrong, but the death of "The Boss" officially took place today - even though he's been practically dead for years now- and that death is prompting me to shift in another direction for today's post.
My focus today is going to center on my annoyance and overall displeasure on the use of death as a way to re-write someones history. New York Yankee Owner George Steinbrenner died today at the age of 80, and last week former NHL tough guy Bob Probert kicked the bucket as well at the age of 45. What I'm surprised and kind of shocked about is people's reactions to their respective deaths. I was under the impression that it was well known and accepted that both of these men were absolute jerks to many people they encountered during their time on earth. Probert was far more of a jerk that Steinbrenner obviously since his overall behavior put people's lives in danger, but I'll touch more on that in a moment.
Let's start with Steinbrenner. OK, I get that in many ways Steinbrenner has done some amazing things as an owner. He's never been shy about spending money to make money, which in terms of the history of owners in sports, is actually very maverick and cavalier. Where he also scored points as an owner is his commitment to winning no matter what. Put it this way, who would you rather have owning your team as a fan, George Steinbrenner or Donald Sterling? The answer is obviously Steinbrenner.
That's where my list of positives ends with The Boss. On the flip side of the coin, Steinbrenner was a convicted felon, as he plead guilty for making illegal campaign contributions to Richard Nixon and to an obstruction of justice charge. That earned him his first suspension in baseball. His second suspension was the result of what he did to Dave Winfield. After making Winfield the highest paid player in the game, George decided to stiff his contractually obligated donations to Winfield's Charity for which Winfield sued Steinbrenner 3 different times to get Steinbrenner to donate! He also paid Howard Spira $40,000 to "dig up dirt" on Winfield. This, as well as the hiring and firings of Billy Martin, Yogi Berra, and other mistreatment of Yankee sacred cows lead to Commissioner Fay Vincent banning Steinbrenner from baseball for life. Obviously that ended once the owners voted Vincent out as commissioner, and Jerry Reinsdorf got Bud Selig to reinstate his old buddy Steinbrenner in 1993. The other part about Steinbrenner that gets missed is just how awful he treated his employees. I'm not referring to his baseball team, or managers, but rather front office employees and people who reported to him. His mistreatment of the "little people" was infamous among Yankee employees, and that ultimately is his legacy in my eyes - he was nothing more than a bully, plain and simple.
As for Bob Probert, it's actually a much darker animal to deal with than Steinbrenner. Probert was beloved in some hockey circles because he was "old time hockey tough"...which from what I understand means he just beat the hell out of people on the ice. I have no problem with appreciating a hockey goon. Goon's are a part of the game, better or worse, but the part that really makes it frustrating about Probert was that he actually was a talented defense man, who CHOSE to be a goon rather than develop his game. Probert also had a looooong history of drug and alcohol abuse. This lead to Probert being arrested at the U.S.-Canadian border with 14 grams of cocaine for which he served 3 months in federal prison. Probert then crashed his motorcycle while having three times the legal limit of alcohol and trace amounts of cocaine in his system. He was also arrested twice more after his playing days were done, including one time where he was tasered by the police. So I think it's safe to say the Probert's ultimate legacy is that while he had "demons", he still managed to put innocent people in harms way by driving drunk, in addition to being a convicted felon. Not exactly a "sweetheart" as he's been described by ex-teammates.
Which leads me to my moral outrage. I have seen the media handle both Probert and Steinbrenner with nothing but oven mitts since their deaths. All of a sudden, both of these convicted felons were "misunderstood", "sweethearts", and "did so much for the community". It's as if their deaths has given both of them character in people's eyes, and it's really sad if that's the case. A wise old man told me a long time ago, that true character shines when people are up against it, and too often when Steinbrenner and Probert were up against it, they failed over and over again.
So please stop telling me that Steinbrenner and Probert were good guys who just made mistakes, let alone try to tell me that they could have given Mother Theresa a run for her money because it's simply not true. They were abusive, tyrannical, and in some cases life threatening to be around. Here's the other truth people need to understand as well, Steinbrenner and Probert never cared about you, and wouldn't pee on you even if you were on fire. Knowing that, do they still deserve the adulation they are currently receiving?
Nice guys indeed...






